Bus Cams on the Table in Gov’s Budget

34thst2.jpgIf New York were allowed to install bus lane enforcement cams, bus riders wouldn’t be slowed so much by illegally parked delivery trucks.

Tucked into an otherwise bleak state budget, there’s one piece of good news for transit riders. One of Governor Paterson’s amendments to the state budget would authorize New York City to keep its bus lanes clear of traffic with camera enforcement. 

New York can’t install bus lane cameras without authorization from Albany. So far, the legislature hasn’t bestowed it, despite wide-ranging support. Two years ago, Assembly transportation commmittee chair David Gantt killed an earlier version of bus camera legislation, leaving New York City bus riders stuck in traffic. 

The new budget amendment would actually be an improvement over that bill. The old legislation limited bus-mounted cameras to the city’s five Select Bus Service routes, while the current version allows camera enforcement on up to 50 miles of bus routes — exactly the length of the city’s current bus lane network. "It’s saying that all bus lanes are important, in every borough," said Lindsey Lusher Shute, Transportation Alternatives’ director of environmental campaigns.

The cameras would either be stationary or mounted on buses, recording the license plates of motorists parked or driving in bus lanes. Fines would be set at a maximum of $125.

Camera enforcement would be a real game-changer for bus riders. Dedicated lanes can mean much faster trips, but in New York, all sorts of other vehicles constantly violate bus lanes. Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer’s office conducted a study last summer which found more than 350 vehicles parked in Midtown bus lanes over a 40 hour period. The police, meanwhile, are at best too thinly stretched to spend sufficient manpower on keeping bus lanes clear, and at worst they’re the source of the problem.

Because NYCDOT and the MTA appear loath to install physically separated lanes for their big-ticket bus improvements on First and Second Avenues, camera enforcement will be critical to achieving better performance. 

"The most effective way to provide faster and more reliable bus service is to enforce bus lanes by cameras," said Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign. "Sporadic and limited ticketing by police just doesn’t keep bus lanes moving, free of illegally stopped cars." 

For the bus camera legislation to emerge intact from the budget
process, both the Assembly and the State Senate will also need to
include it in their budgets, which are expected to be released in about
three weeks. The Senate is fairly likely to include bus cameras in its
budget, said Shute, so the question is whether Gantt will keep it in
the Assembly version.

If not, bus camera legislation would
have to be passed as a stand-alone bill. Assembly Member Jonathan Bing
is already sponsoring one such bill. Advocates will be in Albany on
Wednesday, making the case for cameras.

  • J

    T.A. has an email campaign to support Bus Lane Cameras:

    http://www.transalt.org/takeaction/actioncenter/4269

  • Bolwerk

    This kind of nonsense is why nothing ever gets done. The state needs to devolve all local transportation responsibility to the city and worry about state business.

  • Our local council has just started rolling bus-ticketing out; seen a big surge in tickets and, obviously a major improvement in bus schedules. Any vehicle blocking a bus on one of the showcase route gets a ticket.

    The best bit: cost-effectiveness. There’s no need for any extra enforcement vehicles or people, the buses police the lanes themselves.

  • Kaja

    Really curious how appeals would work here.

    Can I have the photograph brought before a judge, with the bus lane and my license plate both clearly visible? Does a human look at what comes out of the photography stream, and charge me, or does a computer do the charging?

    I’m all for keeping cars out of bus lanes, but matters of liberty come first.

  • I’ve heard of red light camera tickets being successfully appealed. Do you have reason to believe these would be any different?

    Here’s the policy, to go along with my useless anecdote:

    http://www.nyc.gov/html/dof/html/parking/park_red_light_appeal.shtml

  • Shouldn’t an abandoned vehicle blocking traffic be towed?

  • Kaja, here’s how it works in other cities (I have no idea if NYC would use the same method)

    The bus has a video camera out in front always recording. NYC buses may already have this. When the driver comes upon a vehicle in the lane, he pushes a button. This puts a time stamp in the video. The driver doesnt need to do anything else, just one quick button press.

    At the end of the day, someone reviews the video, where the time stamps are. He gets to see 15 seconds or so to determine if the vehicle was in the lane legally (right turn) or illegally (loading).

    If illegal, the car owner gets sent a piece of mail that has the website and a code. They go to the website, enter the code, and see a page showing the 15 seconds of video, and a screen shot of the license plate. You then pay the fine, or appeal it.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

State Senate Undermines Better Enforcement for New Bus Lanes

|
The New York State Senate has proposed diluting the bus lane enforcement provisions in the governor’s draft budget, a maneuver that threatens the effectiveness of new corridors in the city’s fledgling rapid bus network. Bus lanes planned for the B44 corridor in Brooklyn would miss out on camera enforcement under the Senate’s budget resolution. Image: […]