Obama Administration Working on Its Own Six-Year Transportation Bill

The annual powwow of thousands of transportation workers, planners, and wonks that’s known as the Transportation Research Board (TRB) conference kicked off in the capital yesterday with a candid admission from some senior U.S. DOT officials: reorienting American transport planning to accommodate the overlap with housing and environmental sustainability is proving pretty difficult.

Trans_Secretary_Ray_LaHood_Discusses_Cash_Jx_HxR08cPwl.jpgU.S. DOT chief Ray LaHood’s team is working on a six-year transport proposal of its own. (Photo: Getty)

The subscription-only ClimateWire news service caught remarks from Beth Osborne, the Obama team’s deputy assistant secretary for transportation policy, who said the administration’s livability work has been slowed by laws that impede federal participation in local planning:

"A lot of it [is] the disjointed federal programs that
often discourage and certainly do not incentivize the coordination of
housing policy and transportation policy, water infrastructure policy,
economic development policy," she said.

"In fact, within the
transportation program, we really disincentivize this," she said. A
state that improves traffic flow and transit use will burn less
gasoline, meaning it will lose revenue from its main source of
transport funding — the gas tax. "That state that creates greater
efficiency can see their own budget get slashed as a reward."

This tension between the desire to cut transportation emissions and the nation’s reliance on the gas tax for the majority of its transport funding is a familiar one for Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and other urban members of Congress.

Nadler lamented back in June that many states were insisting on a guaranteed rate of return from their gas-tax revenue based on a nonsensical "equity argument" that says: "The more energy-efficient you are, the less gas you use, the less [federal] funding you should get."

One key ingredient in the Obama administration’s effort to carve out a stronger federal role in local planning, of course, is the still-stalled six-year federal transportation bill. And Osborne — seemingly aware of the value of that legislation in removing longstanding obstacles to coordination — told the TRB meeting that "Capitol Hill has asked DOT to craft its own version of a transportation reauthorization bill," according to ClimateWire.

A legislative outline from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who spent much of 2009 urging lawmakers to put off discussion of the next six-year bill until 2011, would be an undeniable boost to Democrats who have long urged the administration to play a more active part in solving the puzzle of long-term financing.

But the political hurdles to enacting a new federal transport bill this year remain steep, as ITS America President Scott Belcher remarked in one of today’s TRB conference sessions.

"Everybody wants to get past the elections" before passing new long-term legislation," Belcher said, "and they want to get past the election because they don’t want to raise taxes."

  • Niccolo Machiavelli

    It is not the genesis of Federal transportation funding from the gas tax that creates the perverse incentive that Cong. Nadler refers to herein it is rather the ideological construction of “donor states” that hardens and deepens this construction. That American government is anti-urban in structure and ideology determines that both land-use decisions and decisions of pure political-economy (like where the money goes) will have a bias toward the low population-high Senatorial representation jurisdictions.

    In transportation political economy the hinterland gets the best of both worlds, having the balance of the political clout and special carve outs or specific operations. There is a 100 bus carve out whereby jurisdictions with less than 100 buses are exempted from the prohibition of using Federal Transportation funds for purposes of operating buses. Larger operations must provide exclusively local support for operations budgets. This political economy punishes population density.

  • Larry Littlefield

    Well you know my views. Eliminate almost all federal transportation spending. Use the savings to implement health care reform in a way that takes the burden off state and local government rather than shift the burden to them.

    Would we come out ahead or behind in $? Regardless we would come out ahead in getting rid of bureaucracy, and not having folks from Alaska make decisions for us.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Portland’s Transport Research Guru Headed to Obama Administration

|
The U.S. DOT is expected to announce today that it has tapped Robert Bertini, a Portland State University professor who headed Oregon’s state-wide transport research effort, as the No. 2 at the Research and Innovative Technology Administration — the government’s home for stats on all things transportation. Robert Bertini. Photo: Oregonian Bertini’s hiring is an […]

NYC’s Next Transportation Commissioner Is Polly Trottenberg

|
Bill de Blasio has appointed US DOT Under Secretary for Policy Polly Trottenberg to lead the New York City Department of Transportation. Trottenberg is a veteran federal policy maker, whose resume includes stints working for New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan on the 1998 federal transportation bill and for Senator Chuck Schumer. At the Obama […]

LaHood Praises NYC But Shrugs at Transport Reform to Empower Cities

|
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood praised the New York City area’s clean-transportation strategy today in a speech to the region’s metropolitan planning organization (MPO), promising a stronger focus on urban priorities even as he all but ruled out two reforms long sought by the nation’s cities. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (Photo: Zimbio) LaHood’s speech to the […]