Even When the Killer Driver Is Drunk, Obstacles to Justice Abound

After two incidents in two months of off-duty NYPD officers running down and killing pedestrians, then refusing to submit to Breathalyzer tests, police Commissioner Ray Kelly this week convened a panel aimed at expediting the collection of blood evidence from motorists arrested on suspicion of driving drunk.

valnord_nivac2.jpgThe deaths of Vionique Valnord and Drana Nivac may spur movement to reevaluate procedures employed to gather DWI blood evidence. What took so long? Photos via New York Times

In September, Andrew Kelly, an officer with Brooklyn’s 68th Precinct, was taken into custody when the SUV he was driving struck Vionique Valnord as she attempted to hail a taxi in Flatlands. According to prosecutors, a sergeant at the scene reported that alcoholic beverages were present in the vehicle, and said Kelly smelled of alcohol, had red, watery eyes and slurred speech. Yet when authorities were finally able to secure a warrant and draw a blood sample some seven hours later, Kelly had no alcohol in his system, potentially compromising the criminal case against him.

It took five hours to get a blood sample from Kevin Spellman, the NYPD detective who reportedly stumbled out of his government-leased Chevy Malibu after hitting 67-year-old Bronx grandmother Drana Nikac last week. Even so, officials said Spellman was found to have a blood alcohol level of .21. As with the Andrew Kelly case, the lag time between the arrest and obtaining blood evidence was heavily scrutinized by the media, perhaps putting pressure on Commissioner Kelly to act.

According to Commissioner Kelly, a major task of his panel will be to suss out the procedures used by all five city district attorney’s offices in obtaining warrants for blood.

"I feel it is extremely possible to speed up the process and can say the DA offices are very interested in working with the Police Department to do so," says Joseph McCormack, chief of the Vehicular Crimes Bureau of Bronx DA Robert Johnson’s office. "There are also some legal changes that would help."

One proposed measure supported by McCormack would remove the state requirement that a doctor be present to supervise blood withdrawals. In 2002, 91-year-old former Olympian Jack Shea was killed in Saranac Lake by a driver who was indicted for vehicular manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide and DWI. Charges were ultimately dropped after courts ruled blood evidence inadmissible based on the fact that, since there was no doctor on duty at the small clinic where Shea and the driver were taken after the crash, the sample was drawn by an EMT. Appellate judges in the Shea case, according to the bill, "called on the legislature to amend the statute to remedy what they saw as an unnecessary restriction in the law."

McCormack and Nassau prosecutor Maureen McCormick are also working on a proposal to remove the up-front warrant requirement in cases of death or serious injury where there is probable cause for DWI. Such procedure is common in other states, says McCormick: "There is no constitutional issue of self-incrimination, which applies only to statements. Blood is physical evidence and subject to a different analysis. The trial judge would review the arresting officer’s assertion of probable cause during pre-trial hearings and if there was not sufficient probable cause to take the evidence it would be suppressed."

Both stress that altering current warrant protocol would enhance the ability of police and prosecutors to gather crucial evidence, but would not change evidentiary requirements.

"These are the exact same circumstances under which blood can be drawn now," McCormick says. "The only change is that instead of precious time being taken up front for a judge to review the probable cause — while the BAC evidence is literally disappearing — the judicial review would take place pre-trial, when time is no longer such a critical issue."

On the subject of time, one can’t help but wonder of Commissioner Kelly’s new committee: What took so long? It’s common knowledge among police, for example, that it is to their advantage to refuse breath tests if suspected of DWI. Did two more innocent people have to die — and at the hands of NYPD officers — for officials to address such a blatant systemic shortcoming?

  • Omri

    Simple solution: any cop refusing a breathalyzer test or a blood test must hand in his badge.

  • Kaja

    Omri: How dare we hold cops to a higher standard than a lay citizen! Indeed, should not a cop’s standard of behavior be far lower than yours or mine, such is their borne burden!

  • In New Jersey, refusing to take a breathalyzer test is legally equivalent to failing the breathalyzer test. The argument is that you’d only turn it down if you’d been drinking.

    It’s become clear by these two incidents that NY does not have a similar law? Or is this an “NYPD above the rest” issue? The law itself makes perfect sense and you’d be hard pressed to find anyone who would object to it.

  • Omri

    It’s not so much above-the-rest as it is a matter of people really familiar with the system knowing how to game it.

  • The law itself makes perfect sense and you’d be hard pressed to find anyone who would object to it.

    Doesn’t that violate the Fifth Amendment?

    Still, I like Omri’s version best.

  • This whole concept that we can’t evaluate, monitor, or expect a certain level of competence out of people in cars is getting out of hand. We’ll happily toss a 19 year-old who has consensual relations with a 17 year-old in prison and then forever label him a “child predator”, but that same 19 year-old can get behind the wheel of a car and kill people and suddenly it’s not his fault and we live in an Orwellian society.

    This happened about 20 years ago when I was living in Atlanta. The woman I was dating was hit by an underage drunk driver (she was 19 or 20). She was clearly drunk. When the police arrived she claimed that while waiting for the police she went into a bar and had a few drinks to calm her nerves. She was then allowed to drive away. I questioned the police officer about this stating she wasn’t old enough to drink, no one witnessed her leaving the scene, if she had left the scene that’s a crime, no officer went to the bar in question asking if she had been in there, and why as a driver who could barely stand up straight allowed to drive away. He shrugged and walked off.

  • Are the twin primary obstacles to justice not the cops and the DA?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Waiting for Raymond: How Many NYPD DWI Disasters Is Too Many?

|
Over an 11-day span in February, three off-duty NYPD officers were arrested for driving under the influence. One was nabbed as he sat behind the wheel of a double-parked car in Harlem. The other two were involved in serious crashes, one of which ended with the officer’s car overturned on a Midtown Manhattan sidewalk. It’s […]