Transportation Policy Becomes the Proverbial Tree Falling in the Forest

Halfway through this afternoon’s rally in support of a new federal transportation bill, there came an accidental but telling moment. A group of tourists, attracted by the hundreds of orange flags planted in the National Mall for the rally, walked through the event and whispered questions to attendees about its purpose. Once their curiosity was sated, the group lost interest and ambled away.

0131mnfederal_dd_graphic_oberstar.jpgRep. Jim Oberstar. Photo: Capitol Chatter

The tourists may well have been speaking for most senior lawmakers on Capitol Hill, where this week’s growing momentum towards a six-month timetable for taking up the next long-term infrastructure bill was abruptly squelched by GOP senators’ inability to find consensus among their members.

As the subscription-only CQ reported today:

Efforts in the Senate
to take up a six-month extension of surface transportation law this
week appear dead, over objections by a few Republicans to passing it
without a full debate, said James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, the ranking
Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee.

… Inhofe said Tuesday that at least two Republicans objected
and that there is not enough floor time to finish a bill this week under
normal procedure. 

The Senate’s lack of progress means that officials working on the nation’s transit, roads, bridges, and bike paths will likely have to continue operating under a second short-term extension of the 2005 transportation law, this time lasting until December 18.

Despite the prospects of continuing uncertainty on the local level, House transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) remained upbeat and focused on a singular goal: getting his colleagues to elevate infrastructure to the top-of-mind status currently occupied by health care (followed by financial regulation and climate change).

"Encircle the White House," Oberstar advised the organizers of today’s rally, who parked heavy-duty construction equipment along the sidewalk to symbolize their plea for more transportation spending. "Encircle the Senate!"

The economic stimulus law’s $48 billion in transport aid, $8.4 billion of which went to transit, "will dry up" by spring of next year, Oberstar added. He threw in a jab at Obama administration officials who insisted on cutting stimulus transit spending to pay for tax cuts: "I don’t know of anybody who’s thanked me for their $250 tax credit … God only knows what’s happened to it."

Speaking to reporters after the rally, Oberstar said that extending
the 2005 transportation law until the holidays "will give us time
between now and Christmas to agree on a six-year bill."

But the Minnesotan’s push for taking up his $450 billion proposal by year’s end has yet to be met with any enthusiasm from the White House and senior Senate Democrats, who until recently had aligned with Obama aides in favor of an 18-month delay.

And even if the Senate had won passage of its six-month extension, Oberstar said he would have raised concerns about the measure in the House, citing several "serious problems." One example, according to Oberstar: the Senate’s plan would have shifted the current grant program for significant projects — which helps fund some transit work — back to the states, potentially jeopardizing the money.

For the moment, long-term transportation policy appears to have become the proverbial tree falling in the forest, with few in the capital taking note as the federal bill languishes and climate legislation climbs higher on the agenda.

  • How many of NYC’s electeds were standing alongside Oberstar? Too few, I guess.

  • Clutch J

    I would think the Streetsblog crowd would be much more interested in the content of the federal bill over its timing. I can wait a year or three for rauthorization if the end result is a federal transportation program with dramatically new priorities. I don’t think Oberstar’s bill gets us there. Do you?

  • poncho

    i see the republicans have found yet another thing to obstruct.

  • Joe Radosevich

    Clutch,

    Oberstar’s bill would be a dramatic transformation of how federal transportation dollars are spent. New highway projects would no longer be given priority, and transit, infrastructure repairs, road safety, and pedestrian and bicycle projects would have a fair shot at federal funding.

    He’s also criticized the CEI formula and is responsible for the largest federal investment in biking and pedestrian transportation infrastructure ever. The safe-routes-to-schools program ($612 million) and the non-motorized transportation pilot program ($100 million) awarded federal grant money to expand biking and pedestrian infrastructure was included in the 2005 bill because of him. Oberstar’s bill gets us exactly where we need to be.

    Poncho,

    Republicans on the committee, while divided over the funding mechanism for the legislation, are actually fairly supportive. It received a strong vote of bi-partisan support from the full committee.

  • Clutch J

    Joe,

    Thanks for your reply. I appreciate your perspective.

    If enacted, the Oberstar proposal would indeed be the best federal transportation bill ever. But for livable communities advocates that’s like being the best tasting castor oil.

    The Metropolitan areas program is very encouraging, as it’s vital to shift power from state DOTs to regional agencies.

    The nonmotorized programs are great, and I also appreciate his enthusiasm for increasing gas taxes and user fees.

    I pledge to look at the proposal again and see if it is in fact transformational or merely puts much pretty lipstick on the pig.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

A Make-or-Break Week for Transportation Begins on the Hill

|
After weeks of uncertainty and tension, the congressional impasse over long-term transportation funding is headed for resolution this week — but the reprieve may be temporary. A decisive week lies ahead for House transport chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN). (Photo: Capitol Chatter) When we last left House transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN), he was calling […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Rep. LaTourette Tells Transit Advocates to Ask Congress for What They Need

|
Transit officials spent the day on Capitol Hill yesterday, meeting with Congressional offices as part of the American Public Transportation Association’s legislative conference. Transportation Committee Chair John Mica suggested they ask members for a six-year bill. Secretary Ray LaHood urged them to ask for support for President Obama’s “big, bold vision” for transportation. Rep. Steve […]

Transport Policy Update: Senate to Pass 6-Month Extension This Week

|
Before week’s end, the Senate will pass a six-month extension of the nation’s four-year-old transportation law — setting the stage for another showdown with the House, where transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar remains on the fence about abandoning the push for a new long-term bill before 2010. Photo: USGS.gov Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) […]
STREETSBLOG USA

And the Capitol Hill Streetsies Go To…

|
Happy 2011! May this year bring peace, harmony, and a six-year transportation reauthorization. The best part about 2011 is that it’s not 2010. Last year was a tough one at the federal level: constant extensions of both the transportation bill and the general budget, no progress on an adequate funding source for infrastructure investment, and […]