LaHood Praises NYC But Shrugs at Transport Reform to Empower Cities

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood praised the New York City area’s clean-transportation strategy today in a speech to the region’s metropolitan planning organization (MPO), promising a stronger focus on urban priorities even as he all but ruled out two reforms long sought by the nation’s cities.

Trans_Secretary_Ray_LaHood_Discusses_Cash_Jx_HxR08cPwl.jpgTransportation Secretary Ray LaHood (Photo: Zimbio)

LaHood’s speech to the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council was well-received by a large crowd of local officials and voters. "In the months ahead, you can expect things to work differently at the DOT," he said, vowing to "provide greater flexibility to metro areas."

As U.S. policy-makers craft climate change policy, LaHood said, "the New York-New Jersey region will, by design and by necessity, point the way forward."

But after his remarks, LaHood revealed the limits of the Obama administration’s ultimate willingness to give cities a stronger voice in transportation decision-making. Asked by NYC Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan about the possibility of allowing urban areas to "opt in" for direct aid from Washington — an idea backed by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg earlier this year — LaHood demurred.

"I think MPOs will be looked at differently in the new
[federal transportation] bill than they have in the past, to take into
account the fact that cities and suburbs have been overlooked," LaHood
said. "We know that’s an issue."

He added: "Whether we
could ever get back to some sort of revenue-sharing [with state DOTs],
probably not — but we could put some emphasis in the new bill for
communities to have more of a say in how dollars are spent."

Sadik-Khan also raised an issue that has frustrated transit advocates for years: the federal government’s policy of matching local funds for roads at an 80-20 ratio, while transit projects receive a less favorable 50-50 federal-to-local match. LaHood’s response suggested that highways would continue to benefit from that advantage.

"The match for transit, as you say, is 50-50," LaHood told Sadik-Khan. "I don’t think the highway people are going to want to go to a 50-50 match. I think you
were thinking about going the other way, 80-20 for transit … well, I take your point."

LaHood, a 14-year veteran House Republican from Illinois before he joined the Obama Cabinet this year, did offer some constructive advice for city planners and residents.

Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi observed that New York, like many urban areas, sends more federal tax dollars to Washington than it receives in aid — one of the few areas in which the city "get[s] back more than we give," as Suozzi put it, is transportation.

"Can you give us any advice about how to be more effective in getting more money from the federal government?" he asked LaHood.

The Cabinet member’s answer touched on a theme that Streetsblog Capitol Hill has discussed in the past: the disconnect between Congress’ uneven focus on urban-dominated states and the high number of senior lawmakers who hail from the nation’s cities. LaHood said:

The way to get more money … is to talk to your delegation. We used to get less [federal money] back for Illinois … until we elected the Speaker of the House from Illinois; then, that changed. You’ve got some very significant members of Congress from New York, not least of which is the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, the chairman of the Rules Committee. You’ve got very strong senators. … It’s going to come when your delegation says, ‘Hey, this region has got its act together. Now we need to pull together.’

  • So LaHood says talk to Schumer. And Schumer talks only to “the Baileys.”

  • Josh

    Useful. Obviously the highway people aren’t going to “want” to go to a 50-50 match. The “transit people” probably don’t “want” a 50-50 match either, but that doesn’t justify anything. Obviously JSK was suggesting that there should be equality of matching rates, way to not say anything of consequence Ray.

  • Ian Turner

    Feds spend too much on transportation already; highways should go to a 50-50 match, and both highway and transit projects should be contingent on local agencies providing adequate levels of operations and maintenance on their own dime for the following decades.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Same.gov: A Transportation Secretary Who’s Hard to Believe In

|
On Monday, Obama announced his "green dream team." Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood wasn’t there. We’ve been calling around to Congressional staffers, advocates and insiders to get a better sense of what Obama’s appointment of Ray LaHood as transportation secretary means for those pushing for sustainable transport, smart growth, livable streets. While no one is giving […]

Obama Talks Urban Policy as LaHood Seeks More Urban Transpo Money

|
Obama during the "sprawl is over" speech last February The White House Office of Urban Affairs, which has drawn criticism for its inactivity at a rocky economic time for the nation’s cities, capped a day-long summit today with a speech by President Obama. Referencing his formative years as a Chicago community organizer, Obama urged the […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Ray LaHood Won’t Stay at USDOT Past 2012

|
LaHood stood behind NYC Transpo Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan at a bicycling event today in DC. Photo: Darren Flusche, League of American Bicyclists Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told the LA Times today that he’s a one-term secretary. Don’t expect him to serve during President Obama’s second term, if there is one, or to run for any […]