District 1 Council Candidates: Safer Streets? Less Traffic? No Thanks.

Reader Ian Dutton sends this dispatch from last night’s candidate debate for the District 1 City Council seat representing Lower Manhattan, organized by the Downtown Express and the Villager. If you’re a District 1 resident who values safer streets and a well-funded transit system, tough luck.

Last night at the Council District 1 candidates debate, in the "lightning round" (one-line answers), a question was "Grand St. bike lane: good or bad."

All the candidates came out strongly against it to the cheers of some in the crowd. Only PJ Kim, the last to comment, tempered his statement with, "but we must not demonize bikers." They all either flatly opposed congestion pricing or want carve-outs for residents (pandering, hmmm?) and opposed East River tolls.

On the congestion pricing question (about 1:31:00 into this audio file posted on the Lo-Down), Pete Gleason and Alan Gerson were the two to outright oppose the idea — although the incumbent Gerson voted for pricing last year. Margaret Chin, the only candidate to express any support for bridge tolls (check the 1:32:00 mark), qualified her answer by saying that car-poolers should be exempt.

Any exemption for congestion pricing or bridge tolls, of course, opens the door to more exemptions. The first people who will take advantage? Exactly the same placard-holders whom District 1 candidates rightly blame for clogging downtown streets.

We’re talking about a district that is absolutely pummeled by bridge traffic, where about 80 percent of the households don’t own a car. Those who do own one earn nearly two-and-a half times those who don’t, on average [PDF]. There was a great opportunity here for a savvy candidate to
separate from the pack on livable streets issues. And yet, no one chose to
grab it.

  • J. Mork

    Re: car-poolers exempt.

    The discount for car-poolers is built in. The more people in the car, the less any charge is per person.

  • DowntownMaven

    I was there and want to clarify that PJ Kim does support congestion pricing but wants to make sure that low income residents and small businesses are accommodated.

  • So long as the connected and moneyed are the ones in power, this is going to be the case. Should an unmoneyed, proletarian councilmen somehow win, they will develop their own connections, get money, and become similar to whom they replaced. Philosopher-kings don’t exist in nature. There is no way out.

    I am awaiting the reality of the oil peak and the death of the boomers.

  • Small businesses SHOULD be accommodated. Deliveries and stuff like that who need to use the streets shouldn’t have to deal with it. It’s private personal cars and luxury cabs (black cars) that should.

  • There is nothing wrong with getting small businesses to pay their share. Trucks and vans cause pollution and take up valuable road space. Under the previous proposal($8 per day) a van that enters the CBD to make four deliveries adds just $2 to an order. Hopefully this small charge will encourage small businesses to make more efficient deliveries and schedule those deliveries during off-peak hours when the charge is not in effect. I am not willing to throw congestion pricing under the bus in an attempt to pander to the mythical small business owner.

  • Congestion pricing is accommodation for small businesses,

    according to Eric Gioia:

    “My dad owns a flower shop in Queens,” said Gioia. “He used to deliver in a truck to Manhattan, but it’s no longer profitable, thanks to the ‘time tax.’ It takes too long, the gas is too expensive. There are business owners in the [city’s] outer ring who are making the decision every day about getting into Manhattan, and the congestion fee is just putting a number on that.”

  • Sorry, here’s the link I meant to put in the last post.

  • I don’t understand why Paul Newell (and others from his campaign) is working for Gleason. No money or support from me…

  • Jean Grillo

    Paul Newell is working for Pete as I am because we want to bring the Lower East Side and the Lower West Side together, at last, in terms of goods and services. That’s why Freddy Ferrer endorsed Pete Gleason and not Gerson (as he has in the past) Not everyone in Lower Manhattan have had their needs for housing and schools represented. Talk to Norma Ramirez and David Diaz who are also backing Pete.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

NYLCV Endorses Safe Streets Foe Alan Gerson for Re-Election

|
The New York League of Conservation Voters came out with their slate of primary endorsements today. Streetsblog readers may be surprised to see that District 1 incumbent Alan Gerson is one of four City Council candidates in Manhattan to win the environmental group’s endorsement. Since last fall, Gerson has agitated against pedestrian and bike improvements, […]

Tuesday: City Council Candidates for District 39 Debate Livable Streets

|
In Democrat-dominated New York City, much of the electoral action happens on primary day. This year’s primaries are fast approaching: Voters go to the polls on September 15, four weeks from tomorrow. Contests for City Council seats, the Manhattan District Attorney’s job, borough presidencies, Public Advocate, and City Comptroller will by and large be decided […]

Parsing the Council Pricing Vote

|
But seriously folks, here are some quick hits from last night’s congestion pricing council victory: All ten Manhattan and seven Bronx council members voted in favor. In Brooklyn the vote was 7-9 against; Queens 5-9, and Staten Island 1-2. Eric Gioia broke with his Queens colleagues to vote in favor of pricing, proving himself no […]

Make That 21 Council Members in Favor of Pricing

|
Council Member Alan Gerson bikes in support of safer cross-town cycling route for Lower Manhattan, Sept. 2006. Villager photo by Jefferson Siegel Following the Gotham Gazette’s surprising report that he was the only Manhattan City Council Member firmly against Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion pricing plan, Lower Manhattan City Council member Alan Gerson has issued a statement […]

Voters Reject Incumbents in Low Turnout Primary

|
Margaret Chin, rallying an anti-DOT crowd last December, defeated Lower Manhattan council rep Alan Gerson in one of several losses for incumbents yesterday. The biggest news from last night’s primaries has to be the ouster of no fewer than four sitting City Council members in a vote marked by low turnout. A fifth incumbent, Maria […]