Cities See Population Gains — But What About Political Power?

The Census Bureau has just released new data showing a resurgence of the nation’s cities, with New York leading the way and Chicago reversing five years of population decline.

2139835490_256cabd440.jpgThe number of New Yorkers grew by an estimated 53,000 this year. Will they get more power in Congress? (Photo: lukegeorgeson via flickr)

The urban growth is being attributed to a combination of demographic re-arrangement — younger families are embracing cities as well as close-in suburbs with transit access — and the unsustainability, both economic and environmental, of living in sprawl.

It’s a pattern that nicely underscores the importance of expanding transportation options beyond the automobile. But will the nation’s rising cities see a corresponding increase in the political influence that’s necessary to move national policy in a new direction? That’s a big question.

The 2010 Census will help determine which states gain or lose seats in the House, the lower congressional chamber where proportional representation rules the roost.

And even if urban populations continue to swell over the next two years, it’s still highly likely that western and southern states — where the housing bubble was largest and sprawl remains the norm — will gain seats in Congress.

"[T]here would have to be a massive reversal of population trends for this not to happen," demographer Andrew Beveridge of Queens College told the New York Times after the 2007 Census. (The New York state legislature is a different story, as Beveridge reported earlier this week — but then again, control of that body may be more trouble than it’s worth.)

New York’s congressional representation is projected to fall by two seats after 2010, hitting a low not seen since the 1810 Census. Illinois and Ohio are also expected to lose representation while Texas and Florida gain seats.

It’s a prospect that has Karl Rove dreaming of a GOP comeback, and one that should make advocates for progressive transportation and climate policy sit up and take notice.

Senior Democrats such as Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-NY), and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) represent urbanites (in San Francisco, New York, and Los Angeles, respectively), but their party’s 77-seat hold on the House requires constant attempts to compromise with colleagues from rural and exurban areas.

The more that lawmakers from a wide variety of areas — particularly highway-fixated and growing states such as Texas — come to embrace the goals of less auto dependence and more sustainable development, the better.

  • JohnBike

    USAToday had the following lame comment as a reason for the increase in urban population.

    “Cities’ rebound may be a result of people not being able to sell their homes or condos or not having jobs to allow them to leave cities.”

    It wasn’t in a quote, it looks like the writters just plugged it in there. Is it part of the media machine to betray urban living as undesirable? It was contradictive to all of the positive reasons for urban living which were quoted in the article.

    John

  • When Bloomberg first broached the subject of congestion pricing, he cited future population growth as one of the reasons for the need to control congestion. Looks like he was right. Are you listening, Sheldon Silver?

  • J. Mork

    Nice catch, JohnBike. I also “like” how they said “homes or condos”; as if it’s impossible for an apartment to be a home.

  • I think this is overblown. It’s worth noting that the Rust Belt is continuing its rapid slide into oblivion. Meanwhile, the vast majority of city growth, outside a few oddballs like New York and Chicago, remains in the South and West where the “cities” are of largely suburban character to begin with.

  • DC Resident

    I’m assuming that the vast majority of streetsblog readership is left-of center (and pro-transit/bike/ped). Given all of the information outlined in the Census report and the subsequent analysis of congressional redistricting, I would strongly encourage each and every one of you to call your congressperson and inform them that you support full voting rights for DC residents. We would give you two senators and a congressperson who are guaranteed to consistently vote in favor of pro-bike/transit/ped policies as well as for other legislation that favors cities and urban interests.

    The District of Columbia: TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Which Cities Are Adding Walkable Housing the Fastest?

|
As more Americans look for walkable places to live, cities are struggling to deliver, and a lot of neighborhoods are becoming less affordable. A new analysis by Kasey Klimes of Copenhagen’s Gehl Studio illustrates how major metro areas have let their supply of walkable housing shrink over the years, contributing to today’s housing crunch. In this chart, Klimes shows how […]