Congress Reluctant to Shine Light on Transportation Earmarks

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is about to unveil a massive bill that will re-authorize federal transportation programs for the next six years. The bill will also include funding for a large number of "earmarks," the congressional pet projects that can include everything from bike trails to Bridges to Nowhere.

Earmarks grew largely in the shadows until a series of pet project-related ethics scandals rocked Washington earlier this decade, helping the Democrats take control of Congress amid promises to make the process more transparent. Still, the House transportation committee is taking a looser approach to earmark openness this year: instead of requiring members of Congress to pose their earmarks early, the panel is merely encouraging members of Congress to do so.

earl_b.jpgRep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) isn’t ashamed of his earmarks. (Photo: Washington Post)

So how can activists on the local level find out whether their local representative is backing big highways or light rail? The Sunlight Foundation, a government watchdog group based in Washington, has pored over the websites of all House members to see who followed the transportation panel’s optional deadline.

Sadly, only 83 lawmakers are letting the public see their transportation earmark requests, compared with 321 who heeded the binding transparency rule followed by the House Appropriations Committee. (The House has 435 members in total, but some swear off earmarks entirely.)

Sunlight’s list of transportation earmarkers can be found here. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), co-leader of the Congressional Bicycle Caucus, has an impressive list of transit projects on his list. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) is seeking more money for the Washington Metro’s planned Purple Line and to expand transit options for Southern Maryland.

On the flip side, two Republican members of Congress are catching some flak for their earmark requests. More on them after the jump…

Sunlight investigator Bill Allison spotted Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) requesting a hefty $83 million for Interstate 66 in his home district — which really should be renamed, because it’s unlikely to ever extend out of Kentucky. When a road project already has a website dedicated to its undoing, one suspects it’s not the best use of taxpayer dollars. 

bachmann.jpgRep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) (Photo: whorunsgov.com)

Perhaps the biggest transportation earmark story so far, however, is Minnesota’s proposal to expand its Northstar commuter rail line. The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported on Friday that Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) has declined to request earmark funding for a longer Northstar line, casting doubt on the $150 million project’s future.

Bachmann’s office told the Star-Tribune that she held off because the state DOT has yet to endorse the Northstar expansion. Yet that delay was caused by the project’s inability to meet federal cost-effectiveness standards that are long overdue for an update. Will Bachmann come around? She’s already put in a call for five road and bridge projects in her state.

Is your local representative on Sunlight’s list? If so — whether their project is good, bad, or ugly — let us know in the comments.

  • My congresscritter isn’t on there, but I did find these New York representatives (more than two links, so it’ll need to be moderated):

    Eliot Engel (Hudson Valley)
    Steve Israel (Long Island, PDF
    Chris Lee (Buffalo)
    Carolyn Maloney (Manhattan, Queens)
    Eric Massa (Central NY, Word doc)

  • Eric Massa (Central NY, Word doc)

  • Eliot Engel (Hudson Valley)
    Steve Israel (Long Island, PDF)

  • As far as I can tell, those are the only ones in the NY delegation who’ve posted anything. It’d be nice if the Sunlight site at least gave you the ability to filter by state.

  • ian

    Woolsey’s not there. It’d be nice if she put SMART up for some funds though, recession means less tax revenue means either part of the line will be built later, or the whole project is delayed. how about a cool $50 mil to get the train rolling within the original 5 year timeframe? We need our small start.

  • Where’s the discussion about how legislators get earmarks because there is no other way to get funding for some good projects. yeah you mentioned the broken CE rating process once, but I’d like to see a discussion about why our funding mechanisms are so broken that congress critters have to go through a “black market” to get what their constituents want. Yeah there are some crazy projects out there, but why is everything sloughed into the “earmark” bin?

  • Maybe it should be renamed something other than Interstate 66 since Interstate 66 already exists in Virginia and the District of Columbia!

  • Monumentality: That’s actually an extension of that I-66 that would run through West Virginia and Kentucky. And would be completely uselss in doing anything other than tearing through bluegrass fields and Appalachian hillsides.

  • KY’s I-66 will bulldoze through the Daniel Boone National Forest. Build roads where they’re needed!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Report: Even After MN Bridge Collapse, Transpo Earmarks Shun Repair

|
In the wake of the 2007 collapse of Minnesota’s I-35 bridge, Washington policymakers vowed a renewed focus on repairing the nation’s aging infrastructure. But weeks after the fatal collapse, Congress approved a transportation spending bill with 704 earmarked projects, at a total cost topping $570 million — and just 11 percent of those earmarks went […]

The Long, Ugly Road to a Federal Transportation Plan

|
Come September 30, Congress has to have a plan in hand to fund the nation's trains, buses, bikes, bridges and roads -- or pass an extension of the 2005 federal bill, locking in the same spending patterns that have nurtured Americans' addiction to the automobile. But the odds are that you haven't heard much about how the process works. What has to happen in order for Congress to meet that September deadline? Let's break it down a bit.
STREETSBLOG USA

Senate’s Draft Transpo Bill Weakens Bike-Ped Programs

|
Last Friday, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee released its draft transportation reauthorization bill. With the GOP-controlled House contemplating a national transportation policy designed for maximum fossil fuel consumption, the best opportunities for reform reside in the Senate. While the 600-page draft that came out of Senator Barbara Boxer’s committee includes some key reforms […]