Congress Takes a First Step Towards Reshaping Transportation Policy

Could Washington’s long, unhealthy love affair with the automobile be coming to an end? An encouraging sign of change came today from two powerful Democratic senators who released a proposal that sets out progressive goals for the upcoming federal transportation bill.

R000361.jpgSenate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) (Photo by Washington Post)

Today’s proposal, sponsored by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (WV) and Sen. Frank Lautenberg (NJ), is what’s known on Capitol Hill as a "marker" — a set of principles intended to help guide the drafting of major legislation. The Rockefeller-Lautenberg marker, which got some early love from the Washington Post, states that the next federal transportation bill should accomplish the following:

  • Reduce national per-capita motor vehicle miles traveled on an annual basis;
  • Cut national motor vehicle-related fatalities in half by 2030;
  • Cut national surface transportation-generated carbon emissions by 40 percent by 2030;
  • Reduce surface transportation delays per capita on an annual basis; 
  • Get 20 percent more critical surface-transportation assets into a state of good repair by 2030;
  • Increase the total usage of public transit, intercity passenger rail and non-motorized transport on an annual basis.

The question of how to monitor and enforce these targets remain unanswered. (And the last target risks looking behind the times, given that transit use is already increasing each year.) But the very fact that Rockefeller and Lautenberg have laid out their priorities is a good thing, given that there may not be the political will to pass a federal transportation bill at all. The more lawmakers talking about reducing emissions and auto use, the better.

  • Shemp

    Obviously the question this raises is why are these guys putting out a bill instead of the Senate committees whose job it is? Senators Boxer and Dodd are the chairs. This seems to reinforce the Streetsblog critique from a week or so ago of Environment Chair Boxer who is reportedly going nowhere fast on transportation and climate.

  • anonymous

    Rock on!

  • Chris in Sacramento

    Shenp:

    Boxer’s “leadership” is indeed something to question at this point, but it’s only fair to note that control over transportation (especially transit) funding and policy is much more diffused in the Senate than in the House.

    Whereas in the House nearly everything runs through the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, in the Senate the Commerce, Banking and Environment & Public Works committees all have jurisdication over various aspects of transportation funding and policy.

    Cheers,
    C-in-S

  • S Bayer

    It would be a mark of significant progress if the goal were to increase per capita transit usage, rather than simply to increase transit usage.

    Since the passage of the Urban Mass Transit Act of 1972, which first established Federal funding for public transit spurred the creation in most major US cities of Public Transit Authorities with dedicated tax bases, we have seen a steady increase in transit ridership increasing in absolute terms, but a steady decrease relative to population, at least until last year, when the spike in gas prices suddenly made transit systems “competitive”.

    Note that the formula used to apportion Federal transit monies provides negligible incentive to increase ridership. Rather the formula is “vendor friendly”, providing incentives to provide service, either bus or fixed guideway, regardless of whether those services actually attract ridership. (For the formula, see http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/2009fullyear_-_Table_4_-_sec_5307__Apportioment_Formula.xls.)

    There is no incentive whatsoever to provide van pools, in spite of the fact that van pools exhibit both the lowest cost per passenger mile and the lowest CO2 emissions per passenger mile of any mode. (Of course if the Federal govt promoted van pooling, Detroit would have to manufacture a whole lot of vans.)

    If Congress should ever get serious about global warming, we should expect to see the funding formula adjusted to provide for a far larger “incentive tier” across all modes.

  • Felicitycarus

    Let’s hope this bill brings about the solution to the deadlock on US transport
    http://bit.ly/kdBzxg

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Senate Commerce Committee Sets the Standard For Transpo Performance

|
The EPW Committee passed the highway portion of the transportation bill last month. The Banking Committee will tackle transit on Friday. And today, transportation reformers applauded as the Commerce Committee passed its bill dealing with the rail and safety component, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Deron Lovaas of NRDC said in his blog post about the […]

Lawmakers Cross Party Lines on Transpo Funding as Debate Rages

|
An 18-month extension of existing transportation law cleared the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee today, but not before spirited debate on a proposal billed as a compromise with House members who remain strongly opposed to the Senate’s stopgap. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), chairman of the Senate environment committee (Photo: Politics Now) The "clean" re-upping of […]

Senate Agrees on $26.8 Billion Highway Trust Fund Rescue

|
The Senate took a major step forward last night in its battle with the House over transportation funding, releasing a plan to give $26.8 billion to the dwindling highway trust fund and — perhaps most importantly, for the long term — to restore the fund’s ability to keep the interest it earns. Senate Finance Committee […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Mica’s Transportation Proposal: Responses Flood In

|
The GOP transportation bill proposal is now online. Here are some early reactions. Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ), chair of the Senate Banking subcommittee with jurisdiction over public transportation: “It used to be that Republicans understood that transportation investment was necessary to spur economic growth and create jobs. Now, I guess they think if we give […]