Stimulus Fight Heats Up in Senate and House

On Friday, the Senate Appropriations Committee released its version of an economic recovery package [PDF]. The major line items for transportation don’t differ much from the draft now circulating in the House:

  • $27 billion for formula highway investments.
  • $8.4 billion for formula investments in public transportation.
  • $5.5 billion for competitive grants to state and local governments for surface transportation investments.
  • $1.3 billion for investments in our air transportation system.
  • $1.1 billion for investments in rail transportation.

The transit portion is down from $9 billion in the House version. And the lack of funding for transit operations again sticks out like a sore thumb.

What’s most intriguing here is the $5.5 billion for "competitive grants." Would that money go to expand the Urban Partnership program, which is helping San Francisco to modernize on-street parking and nearly brought congestion pricing to New York City? We’re asking around to pin down an answer.

Meanwhile, in the House, the campaign to bolster the share for transit is intensifying. In addition to efforts by Peter DeFazio to win back $2 billion for transit operations, New York Rep. Jerrold Nadler has introduced an amendment to bump up transit capital investments by $3 billion. It is absolutely critical to call legislators as soon as you can to voice support for both of these amendments. Louise Slaughter, chair of the House Rules Committee — which is set to vote on the amendments tomorrow afternoon — is target number one. House Appropriations Chair David Obey also wields considerable power over the adoption of these measures, and calling your own representative always helps.

The next few days will be crunch time for green transportation advocates, as details get hammered out in both chambers. Let’s not forget, New York and other urbanized states have an uphill climb in the Senate, which gives disproportionate power to rural states. Transit supporters will have to speak loud and clear to get legislation that doesn’t leave green transportation behind.

  • Rep. DeFazio was required to withdraw his amendment due to some sort of parliamentary issue. So no operating assistance in the House bill unless something drastic changes. And it’s possible that targeting Rep. Slaughter won’t make a difference at this point. (But folks in her district in NY should certainly still be calling her.) Obey and Pelosi could be legitimate targets on this, because it seems to be a leadership decision to keep from adding any money or new programs to the bill. Nadler’s amendment is still in play and should be supported.

    We’ve updated the “target number one” above link to reflect that.

  • Larry Littlefield

    Yikes!

    Please implement universal health care (or get rid of Medicare, because we are either all in it together or we are not). Save state and local governments a bundle in doing so.

    And to help pay for it, eliminate federal infrastructure spending, because we could afford to pay for our own. Bring those decisions home — to City Hall, not Albany.

  • Wiener

    “New York Rep. Jerrold Nadler has introduced an amendment to bump up transit capital investments by $3 billion.”

    Well, of course he has. His district stands to get a huge share of any additional money for transit. Probably a larger share than any other congressional district in the country. It’s all about the money.

  • Larry Littlefield

    “It’s all about the money.”

    The free money, because it’s all borrowed and the next generation pays. Thus, no incentive to worry about how well it is spent. As they say, “capital money is less green.”

    Federal money is fine, except that our children will end up paying for OTHER PEOPLE’s wasted federal money. I’d just as soon get rid of it.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

House Jobs Bill Mimics the Stimulus: $27.5B for Roads, $8.4B for Transit

|
The House is slated to vote as soon as today on a job-creation package that includes $27.5 billion for highways and $8.4 billion for transit, according to a transportation committee document obtained by Streetsblog Capitol Hill. House transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) (Photo: Bike Portland via Flickr) That funding divide mirrors the spending levels […]

White House Economic Report Touts TIGER, High-Speed Rail, Transit

|
The White House Council of Economic Advisers’ first annual report under President Obama made headlines today for its gloomy job-creation outlook, but tucked inside its 462 pages is a tangible reflection of a changed outlook on transportation policy under the new administration. Top White House economic adviser Christina Romer, at right, holds up yesterday’s report. […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Obama Proposes Infra Bank, Livability Grants, Doubling Transit Funds

|
The White House has released a fact sheet on the transportation provisions in the President’s budget [PDF]. Here are the highlights, straight from the document: Provides $13.4 billion in discretionary resources in 2012, a $1.3 billion decrease from 2010 levels. (This figure excludes $109 billion in obligation limitations for the surface transportation plan. Including surface […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Boxer Aims to Put TIGER-Type Program in Next Federal Transport Bill

|
During an otherwise-abbreviated hearing yesterday, Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA)  joined the chorus of praise for the stimulus law’s TIGER program, declaring her intention to add a version of the competitive infrastructure grants to the next long-term federal transportation bill. Bicyclists in Philadelphia, where $23 million in TIGER money was awarded to build […]

Urgent Action: Oppose Highway Robbery in Senate Stim Bill

|
Stimulus debate continues today in the Senate, where the stale ideas keep on coming. In addition to the $50 billion highway slush fund floated by Senators Boxer and Inhofe (no vote on that one yet), Missouri’s Kit Bond plans to offer two amendments that would rob from transit, rail, and green transportation to pay for […]