AIG Collapse Leaves Transit Agencies in the Lurch

njtransit.jpgDozens of local transit agencies, already laboring to move more riders while costs go up, have a new financial hurdle to clear. The collapse of AIG threatens to force them to pay back bank deals ahead of schedule, and service cuts may follow. The Philly Inquirer explains:

The trouble stems from leasing arrangements made years ago between
transit agencies and lenders in which the banks bought transit
equipment and facilities, such as railcars and stations, and leased
them back to the agencies.

The transit agencies got much-needed cash, and the banks got tax
benefits. In 2003, the tax benefits from those kinds of transactions
were prohibited by the IRS.

AIG served as the insurer of many of those deals. The collapse of AIG
downgraded its credit rating, allowing the lenders to demand full
payment from the transit agencies if the agencies did not quickly find
other insurers.

NJTransit is on the hook for up to $150 million; Chicago agencies may have to repay more than $100 million; Los Angeles County — as much as $300 million; Washington Metro‘s worst-case obligation is $400 million. According to the Hill, the total exposure of more than 30 transit agencies could reach "well over $1 billion." (The MTA has not been affected as much as other agencies, according to an agency spokesman; any impact on its budget will be addressed at a November 10 meeting of the MTA Finance Committee.)

The Newark Star-Ledger reported today on the consequences for NJTransit:

"The timing couldn’t be any worse," said
state Transportation Commissioner Kris Kolluri. "It
would add such a dramatic burden on the transit agency you
would need drastic service cuts or the curtailing of the
capital program."

Four Senators have written to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke, asking them to intervene:

"If the Treasury and Federal Reserve do not act quickly, public transit
agencies around the nation could become financially crippled and
several banks could enjoy unjustified windfalls," read the letter,
which was signed by Sens. Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg of New
Jersey, Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois and Sen. Barbara Boxer of
California.

A spokesman for Senator Lautenberg told Streetsblog yesterday that "we need intervention as soon as possible" but that the Treasury has yet to respond to the letter. Press reports indicate that the Treasury is in talks with agencies, including NJTransit, about possible solutions. One way the feds could assist is by stepping in to back up the leases instead of AIG, according to the Associated Press.

All of which raises a 122 billion dollar question, says blogger Ryan Avent:

One might ask just what the hell was the point of giving AIG government
credit worth $122 billion (and counting) if it wasn’t going to prevent
the deals the firm guaranteed from falling apart.

Photo: robotbrainz/Flickr

  • The next president would be wise to devote bailout cash to keeping transit systems running — as opposed to shoveling it into the gaping maws of the auto makers. People who drive have the option of keeping their existing cars running for a few more years. A transit user faced with service cuts can’t adapt as easily. And there will be more transit users — and fewer drivers — over time. So maintaining service levels and protecting capital programs would be a better investment than propping up car makers.

  • Larry Littlefield

    One thing the posted summary doesn’t mention — the transit agencies got up front cash as a part of these deals, cash that they have already spent.

    The disaster would happen in an unspecified future no one cared about. Look under any rock, and you see the same priorities over and over again — the war against younger generations and the future.

    “The timing couldn’t be any worse,” said state Transportation Commissioner Kris Kolluri. “It would add such a dramatic burden on the transit agency you would need drastic service cuts or the curtailing of the capital program.”

    When did New Jersey plan for the deals to fall apart? In a financial boom? Of course the reverse is when everything they did is falling apart.

    BTW, Bloomberg and Giuliani once proposed similar deals with the entire NYC water system, which someone else would then have owned.

    Just a little suggestion — BANKRUPTCY. We have no obligations here. Let the rich, who hold the financial IOUs, try to collect from the polticians, the senior citizens, the political class. Leave us serfs alone.

  • Now we see why the AIG bailout was championed by the New York governor.

  • Larry Littlefield

    The New York Governor has proposed leasing state assets, with upfront payments, as a way to balance the budget. After all, it’s “free” money. As long as the devastation doesn’t happen until after his re-election.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Livability and the GOP: A Conversation With HUD’s Mariia Zimmerman

|
Perhaps the Obama administration’s greatest contribution to building more livable, less traffic-choked communities has been the new partnership between three agencies — DOT, EPA, and HUD — which are helping towns and cities grow more sustainably, using strategies from brownfield redevelopment to the provision of affordable housing along transit corridors. The agencies have collaborated to […]