LA.Streetsblog: The Joy of Poor Circulation

pico.jpg

Every week, KCRW radio’s Marc Porter Zasada sets out to fathom Los Angeles on his show The Urban Man. This week he talks about neighborhoods, how fragile they are and how easily they can be lost to bad traffic engineering:

On
Monday you walked around the block for coffee and croissants, down
where narrow streets filled pleasantly with a confusion of people and
cars. There you idled in front of a flower shop and popped into a tiny
market for apples, where you joked with the beautiful cashier.

Then
lo, Tuesday morning you step out your door and find that someone has
widened the street and added an on-ramp. At the end of the block, an
Office Depot looms. Just like that, romance flees. Soon you’re driving
to Costco for apples and croissants. Soon, you forget the beautiful
cashier.

What happened? Someone saw the confusion of people and cars, and decided to improve your life with better traffic circulation. Your
little local fling was sacrificed to that greatest of all affairs–the
automobile. Your city squeeze was embraced by the great, gray sprawl of
parking lots and Taco Bells.

The Urban Man goes
on to claim that the best parts of Los Angeles are the neighborhoods
where "traffic circulation" is lousiest. Well-meaning people rarely
understand this. But if you look closely, the market understands this
perfectly. The
most inconvenient neighborhoods for driving have the highest property
values; Beverly Hills, San Marino, Brentwood, the Palisades.

Urbanists have known for decades that the increased traffic speed of one-way streets makes walking less appealing.
And they know that whenever circulation improves, people shop further,
work further, and slowly abandon the love of neighborhood. These roads
would cease being "neighborhood main streets." Most importantly, as the
city spreads and thins, traffic ultimately gets…worse.

Back in 1961, the great urbanist Jane Jacobs wrote a book called The Death and Life of Great American Cities,
which explained all this very clearly. And yes, across America, a few
enlightened cities have stopped building expressways and have turned
back to two-way traffic. They’ve learned to let congestion do its
joyful work.

Maybe if every
politician were forced to read Jacobs’ book, their eyes would be
opened. Maybe they’d see that a neighborhood with poor circulation is a
neighborhood with hope–not to mention a place that might someday vote
for subway bonds.

This morning the Urban Man strolls Pico
near Robertson. This is my own little hood, where despite the immense
wealth surrounding the boulevard, flower shops and cafes struggle. Like the politicians, I’m not sure they realize that improving circulation would make their situation worse, not better.

Personally,
I’m thrilled to see drivers waiting in growing frustration for left
hand turns. In fact, I’d like to propose making this area much more
difficult to navigate in an automobile. Today, the Urban Man would like
to formally propose narrowing Pico to one lane in each direction, then
running a trolley right down the middle, from Downtown to the sea. Just
imagine the complications. In fact, such a move might improve not just
my neighborhood, but encourage many happy affairs in what could someday
be a great city for people instead of cars.

Photo: FireMonkeyFish/Flickr

  • As a fellow Angeleno, I can only dream that one day we’ll de-emphasize the automobile enough to let our old commercial corridors thrive once again.

  • ddartley

    “Urbanists have known for decades that the increased traffic speed of one-way streets makes walking less appealing. And they know that whenever circulation improves, people shop further, work further, and slowly abandon the love of neighborhood.”

    THESE are some reasons I have always been hesitant about congestion pricing! Beware! Seriously, if NYC adopts pricing, we must also do more, like reduce the speed limit on the books, or seriously physically calm our streets. One of the big selling points of congestion pricing is that it increases the overall speed of traffic. Hello, collisions and death? WTF!

  • Greg Raisman

    Here is an inspiring video about Houten, The Netherlands where the entire city is designed with the type of circulation the Urban Man seems to be getting at.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4QT5rvnfS0

    Enjoy.
    Greg

  • Angus Grieve-Smith

    D, I was also concerned by the phrase “increased speeds.” But the current speeds are so low that I don’t think the increase would make things that much less safe. For example, once (back in ’95 or ’97, I think) I rented a truck in Chelsea to move some stuff in Brooklyn, and it took me half an hour to get from 16th and Ninth to 16th and Third.

    Still, I’d like to see some data. In areas where the speeds are projected to increase too much, the streets could be calmed by widening sidewalks, installing bus lanes or making the streets two-way. The timing could be adjusted too: West End Avenue is a disaster, for example.

  • LisaB

    Interestingly, this is Vancouver’s approach too – embracing congestion as part of vibrant streets. Good article on it here: http://www.vanmag.com/articles/07jun/Drivinglessons.shtml

  • I don’t entirely understand the problem with one way streets. In Chicago most side streets are one way, and I rather like it — it keeps the street width down, while giving enough room so that bikes and cars can share the road easily (including bikes going the wrong way), people can double park, and the kind of flexibility you need for a multiuse road. And multiuse roads seem like at least part of the positive aspect of congestion — roads that aren’t just for moving through, but for loading and unloading, for pedestrians and bikes and the occasional motorized wheelchair or a homeless guy with a shopping cart.

    Larger one-way roads help people moving through the community and punish people traveling short distances inside the community. But on small roads I don’t think the logic applies.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The Real Reason Uber Traffic Matters in NYC

|
For a moment yesterday, it seemed like the big clash between the taxi medallion industry and app-based car services, framed in terms of Uber’s effect on snarled Manhattan traffic, might veer into unexpectedly brilliant territory. There was Deputy Mayor Anthony Shorris in the Daily News, telling the MTA that City Hall would consider the Move NY traffic […]

To Obey, Or Not to Obey

|
Not getting flattened by a 50,000 pound "big rig" is a good reason to stop at a red light if you’re on a bicycle. But how about less skin-saving reasons? Are there in fact, good reasons to ignore traffic regulations when you can, because after all, they are really meant just for cars? It’s a […]

Of Red Lights, Helmets, and Bike Lanes

|
From Streetsblog San Francisco contributor Chris Carlsson:  The Oregon Legislature has flushed an effort to bring the Idaho rolling stop law to that state. It’s a bit of a surprise, given both the simple and proven efficacy of allowing cyclists to make rolling stops, as well as Oregon’s big reputation as a bastion of cycling […]