Double-Parking in a Bike Lane? There Isn’t Even a Check Box.

ParkingTicket.jpgThose of you who are sick of reading about DOT’s plan for Park Slope’s 9th Street and the small but well-organized group of car-owning residents who are opposed to it, will be pleased to know that whole affair may soon be resolved.

On Thursday, May 17, the transportation committee of Community Board 6 will take up the 9th Street issue once again. This very same committee voted in favor of DOT’s plan back in March but that wasn’t good enough for the full board, who sent the plan back to committee, presumably, for more information from DOT. It is important that people who support DOT’s "Road Diet" plan show up, make their support known and, most important, try to educate Community Board members about its benefits for the neighborhood. Mark your calendars:

Thursday, May 17, 6:30 pm
Old First Church

729 Carroll Street
(corner of 7th Avenue)

Likewise, supporters will need to come out to the general board meeting on Wednesday, June 13, 6:30 pm. It would be sad to see CB6, the Community Board with, probably, the highest rate of cycling in the entire city reject a traffic safety plan for 9th Street because it includes bike lanes.

One of the main reasons why this group of 9th Street residents wants to eliminate the bike lane portion of the plan is because they believe that bike lanes will prevent them from double-parking and will also cost them more in traffic tickets.

Robert Levine, the Community Board member who has been leading the neighborhood opposition, has been telling elected officials and anyone else who will listen that the fine for double-parking in a bike lane is higher than normal double-parking fines.

There is no basis in reality for Levine’s claim. The Department of Finance web site makes clear that double-parking in a bike lane, Violation 48, carries the same $115 fine as double-parking anywhere else, Violation 46.

And here’s the kicker: It turns out that the New York City parking summons doesn’t even have a check box for double-parking in a
bike lane!
Violation 48, "Stopping, standing or parking within a
designated bicycle lane," isn’t even on there. (Thus exists the special niche filled by this web site).

Unfortunately, Levine doesn’t seem to be much interested in policy arguments, studies or facts. On 9th Street he is pursuing a kind of "Swift Boat" strategy — just keep raising doubts, stoking anxiety and throwing mud at DOT’s plan and eventually some of it sticks, people have doubts and the plan becomes "controversial."

Don’t make the mistake John Kerry made in the 2004 presidential campaign. Livable Streets advocates need to show up next Thursday and make sure that the facts are known. I fully believe that the more people understand DOT’s plan for 9th Street, the more they will see that it is thoughtful, responsive and something that needs to move forward.

  • JK

    stop apologizing. This is an important fight. This is real, here and now, something that some of your readers can affect directly. Keep it going!

  • Clarence

    Aaron,

    Yeah. What he said. Even folks in Boston who were avid Streetsblog readers told me on Wednesday that they identified with it. It is like a good rasslin’ match, but we are the good guys. And in wrestling, the good guys almost always win.

  • Yeah, I’m learning from this. I expect to face the same situation when DOT rolls out crosstown bike lanes up on the East side.

    But maybe this needs it’s own website after it’s all over: http://www.9th.Streetsblog.org ?

  • David

    speaking as bike enthusiast and car owner in brooklyn (this is not a paradox!)- you should join the fight to making the idiots in the parking violations department more reasonable on this matter. I welcome the bike lane on my street in ft. greene- but for 1.5 hrs two days a week you should be willing to put up with the oh so enormous inconvenience of riding around the non $115 dollar ticket double parked cars for the benefit that we all enjoy – clean streets.
    dcz

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

9th Street Road Diet Meeting Tonight

|
Konrad Kaletsch‘s street safety petition to DOT, July 2005. Tonight, the Department of Transportation’s Traffic Safety and Bike Lane plan for Park Slope’s crash-prone 9th Street comes up before the transportation committee of Community Board 6 for the second time. Here are  the details: 6:30 pm at Old First Church729 Carroll Street at 7th Avenue […]

Speak Up for Chrystie Street Improvements on Tuesday

|
DOT plans for Chrystie Street would replace parking with bike lanes. From Transportation Alternatives Bicycle Campaign Coordinator Caroline Samponaro: On Tuesday, May 27th, the DOT will be presenting plans for improved Manhattan Bridge bike access via the Chrystie Street bike lane to Community Board 3. As you may recall, the CB 3 Transportation Committee voted […]

Aug. ’05 Flashback: 1,200 Slopers Demand a Safer 9th Street

|
Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz and 9th St. resident Konrad Kaletsch at Dizzy’s Diner, Eighth Ave. and 9th St., August 2, 2005. That’s DOT Borough Commissioner Lori Ardito in the background wearing shades and looking none too happy to be harangued by Park Slopers demanding safer streets. Tomorrow evening the transportation committee of Community Board […]

Brooklyn Community Board Supports DOT’s 9th Street Plan

|
Last night, Brooklyn’s Community Board 6 narrowly voted in favor of a resolution supporting the Department of Transportation’s plan to put Park Slope’s 9th Street on a "Road Diet." So, that’s that. After two months of fighting it’s all over but for the Thermoplast. We would enjoy saying that the group of 9th Street residents […]