Pedestrian Safety: London Shows How NYC Can Do Better

london_pedspace2.jpg

Saturday afternoon traffic congestion on a London street near Covent Garden with dimensions and land use almost identical to Prince Street in Manhattan.

In the days before Wednesday’s hearing on pedestrian safety, the City Council should consider how badly New York City pedestrians fare compare to those in London. While pedestrian safety has been improving in both cities these last few years, 4,000 more walkers are struck and injured by motor vehicles in New York City each year compared to its competitor across the Atlantic. Clearly, New York City can be doing more and better to make its streets safer for walking.

ped_injuries_chart.jpg
If NYC streets were as safe as London’s 4,000 fewer pedestrians would be injured by motor vehicles each year.

New York City and London compete for the title of greatest city in the world. The two growing cities are remarkable similar in their density, transit use, ethnic diversity and bustling economies and culture. But when it comes to pedestrian safety, London is clearly winning. When adjusted for population, about 63% more New Yorkers on foot are struck by motor vehicles than their walking brethren in Greater London. Worse yet, while London continues to make great progress reducing pedestrian injuries — a 9% drop in 2006 — unreleased NYC police data shows that New York City pedestrian injuries increased in 2006.


Seven Dials near Covent Garden: Pedestrians, motorists and cyclists share public space.

Both New York and London made immense strides improving pedestrian safety over the last 15 years. The incidence of pedestrian injuries in NYC declined by an impressive 44% from 1990 to 2005, from 222 to 124 people struck per 100,000 people per year. London’s incidence of pedestrian injuries fell by 53%, from 178 to 84 per 100,000 population during the same period. (In raw numbers, the number of pedestrians struck in NYC fell from 16,288 people to 10,197, compared to a reduction from 12,127 to 6,206 in London).


Neal
Street somehow manages to thrive as one of London’s great shopping
destinations without providing on-street parking.

 
London’s success in reducing pedestrian injuries is no surprise. London mayor Ken Livingston is a vocal proponent of reducing car use and encouraging walking and cycling. Livingstone understands that walking is a fundamental part of a "sustainable" city. In contrast, New York City officials speak of "balancing the needs" of motorists and pedestrians. In practice this often means placing traffic flow before the well being of people on foot; something which can be seen from West Houston Street in Manhattan to Grand Army Plaza or Eastern Parkway in Brooklyn.

 

Trafalgar Square: The pedestrian plaza in the background was once a busy, congested motorway.

Livingstone has made ambitious traffic safety and walking goals central to his sustainability plans. London has an extensive Safe Routes to School program, numerous 20 mph traffic calming zones in residential neighborhoods, an aggressive program to convert prominent places like Trafalgar Square into car-free public space, a new generation of digital speed cameras — London has 800 speed and red light cameras compared to 100 red light cameras in NYC — and congestion pricing in the central business district.

The result is a 29% reduction in the incidence of pedestrian injuries in London from 2000 to 2005 compared to a 14% reduction in NYC during the same five-year period. A New York City serious about being a great sustainable city has much to learn from London about better and safer walking.


ped-injuries-chart2_1.jpgNote on sources for this article: NYC pedestrian injury numbers are from the State Department of Motor Vehicles based on reports from the NYPD. These pedestrian injury numbers are conservative. For unknown reasons, internal records kept by the NYPD and NYCDOT show pedestrian injuries occurring 20% to 40% more frequently than NYDMV. For 2006, NYC population is based on US census estimates and NYC pedestrian injuries are conservatively assumed to be the same as 2005. NYSDMV pedestrian injury numbers for 2006 will not be available until Fall 2007. All London data is from Transport for London.

Photos: Aaron Naparstek, March 2007

  • I think advocates shouldn’t get into the trap of treating this just as a numbers game. Clearly NYC got its numbers down by focusing on a few really bad areas. That’s fine, but it leaves 99% of the city unaffected. The big difference in approaches here is that London is trying to create good places to walk. NYC is just responding to pressure and news articles that make city gov’t look bad.

  • JK

    The piece makes it pretty clear that Livingstone clearly gets it when it comes to walking and sustainability. NYC is not going to get its own pedestrian injury numbers down much more until (and if) it follows suit. Interesting point not brought out here is the virtuous circle of congestion pricing>less traffic>more space for pedestrians>fewer pedestrians hurt.

  • A nifty tool for London pedestrians: WalkIt let’s you measure how many calories you burn, and how much you save in carbon emissions going from point A to point B on foot vs. by vehicle. How about getting them to do a New York version?

  • kai

    I’d like to point out a cultural difference as well.

    As someone who grew up in New York and has been living in London for the past 8 years, I would have assumed that pedestrians in NY were safer.

    This is because autos have the right of way here in London. If a car is coming, people get out of the way — and to an American this seems more dangerous.

    However, given the statistics I wonder if people in London have to be more aware of putting themselves into harm’s way rather than placing the responsibility on the driver not to hit them when they step out into the street.

  • That must be coupled with significant pedestrian-only crossing times, otherwise no one would ever get across busy streets. In signaled NY crosswalks we’re in constant conflict with turning drivers, forever having to enforce laws with our bodies. If the city wants to give me my very own fifteen seconds to cross the street instead of a death match with cars, I’ll gladly make that trade. And crosswalks with no signals may as well be removed or become signalled, since drivers would rather run over us then obey them.

    “putting themselves into harm’s way rather than placing the responsibility on the driver not to hit them when they step out into the street”
    Is stepping into the street in front of turning cars, with a walk sign, and a crosswalk, really so bad? If nothing else, I’m for changing the laws (and getting some ped-only time) as you suggest just so I can stop defending against this dumb/distracted/law-abiding pedestrian stereotype.

  • Fantastic use of data!

  • here in london we even have a walking strategy – loads of resources at mayor ken’s site here
    http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/transport/walking.jsp

    kai didn’t quite get it right by law pedestrians have right of way at all times. although cyclists sometimes ignore that……

  • Mario

    It seems if everyone is a little off base. These numbers are by population, but why not by pedestrians? Of the PEDESTRIANS in London and NYC, what is the PERCENTAGE that are involved in accidents? The fact of the matter is that NYC has more pedestrians and therefore it makes sense there would be more pedestrians involved in accidents. The only way to analyze is to know how many pedestrians there are in each city and then compare it to accidents.

    I am also a New Yorker and have been living in London for about 2 years and London appears to less sensitive to pedestrians than NY. The crosswalks do not allow for enough time to cross the street, there are partitions and bars that restrict the area where pedestrians can cross, causing congestion, and the bicycle path is non-existent. There are also areas of London where there is not a sidewalk at all, completely catering to an automobile-centric environment.

    To me, the London drive does not respect the pedestrian and perhaps the city should focus on policy that focuses on the pedestrian and teaching the driver that they belong on the streets as much as the automobile.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

CrashStat Upgrade Provides Interactive, Up-To-Date Street Safety Data

|
Transportation Alternatives launched an updated version of its CrashStat website today, providing a wealth of new data about street safety in New York City and where pedestrians and cyclists are most at risk. The upgrade adds four years of geo-coded data about traffic injuries and fatalities, a smoother interface, and a wealth of interactive features. […]

What’s Causing the Drop in Bike-on-Ped Injuries?

|
Well, it didn’t take long for our local media to mangle the Hunter College study measuring bike-on-ped injuries in New York state. Statewide hospital data compiled by professors Peter Tuckel and William Milczarik plainly show a drop in pedestrian injuries caused by cyclists between 2007 and 2010 — the same period when NYC doubled the […]

2014 Was an Improvement for NYC Street Safety, Not a Breakthrough

|
Last week, City Hall came out with the preliminary total for NYC traffic deaths in 2014. Pedestrian fatalities reached an all-time low and overall traffic deaths may have too, indicating that the de Blasio administration’s street safety policies made an impact in the first year of its Vision Zero initiative. With at least 248 lives lost, however, […]

Pedestrian Mall Revolution

|
The other day, the NYC Department of Transportation unveiled a proposal to build a new pedestrian-only plaza with tables, benches, greenery and bike racks in Downtown Brooklyn along two blocks where Willoughby and Adams Streets intersect. According to a New York 1 report, the bottom two floors of the city-owned building at 345 Adams will […]