Weinshall in Stockholm: Praying for Safer Streets

weinshall.jpg"The tragic loss of two bicyclists this week has shocked all of us and our thoughts and prayers are with the victims’ families and friends. Unfortunately, New York City’s crowded streets often cause conflict between cars and bicyclists as they attempt to share limited space."
— NYC DOT statement, June 29, 2006.

On Thursday, June 29, 2006, as DOT’s press office was issuing the statement above, New York City Department of Transportation Commissioner Iris Weinshall was in Stockholm, Sweden. She was there to make two presentations to the 11th Annual IMPACTS conference, an international networking event for transportation administrators and professionals from cities in Europe, North America and Latin America.

The first day’s focus was congestion pricing (Warning: most of these are links to PDF files) and on Thursday Weinshall’s professional counterparts from Stockholm, London, Amsterdam and Copenhagen made detailed presentations on the far-reaching measures that they were taking to reduce traffic, use their cities "limited space" more efficiently, and reduce the type of "conflict" that killed three New York City cyclists in June alone.

Stockholm is the latest major world city to implement a congestion pricing system to reduce urban traffic and the conference kicked off with a presentation by the city’s Deputy CEO, Gunnar Soderholm. According to Soderholm’s Powerpoint presentation, available online, since launching the congestion pricing system in January, the number of vehicles driving in and out of Stockholm is down 20 to 25 percent. Congestion, or time spent sitting in traffic, is down 30 to 50 percent in the inner city. Noxious emissions have decreased 10 to 14 percent. And there have been no negative impacts on Stockholm’s retail or economic growth. All of these results exceed the city’s original goals. Facing widespread opposition at its start, polls now show that a majority of Stockholm residents approve of congestion pricing and say they will vote to keep it in place when the issue comes up as in a citywide referendum at the end of July.

Later in the day, a similar story was told by John Mason, Transport for London’s Head of Enforcement. London’s congestion pricing system, up and running for four years now, has reduced congestion in Central London by 26 percent. Thirty-seven percent fewer cars travel through the middle of the city. Congestion pricing is raising £110 million per year most of which is being plowed back into the city’s bus network. As a result, bus patronage is way up and bus reliability and travel times have vastly improved. An unexpected side benefit of congestion pricing is that there are 40 to 70 fewer motor vehicle crashes annually in Central London, air quality has improved measurably and climate change-causing carbon dioxide emissions are down. Though there are fewer cars and less traffic, essentially the same number of people are traveling in and out of Central London daily, the impact on business has been "broadly neutral," and polling shows that the majority of businesses "recognize that decongestion has created a more pleasant working environment."

The focus of the conference’s second day was "unexpected events." While European transportation administrators boasted of successes in reducing traffic and ambitious plans for the future, on Friday New York City’s transportation commissioner made one presentation on New York City’s response to December 2005 transit strike and another on post-9/11 security in New York City. Weinshall had no big traffic reduction strategies or plans to share with the assembled because unlike the other cities at the conference, New York City doesn’t have any.

I asked a Department of Transportation spokesperson if Commissioner Weinshall took the opportunity of a Stockholm visit to "look at the new congestion pricing system, experience its effects, or talk with any officials about how it’s working out." I was told that "the only time the Commissioner heard about congestion pricing was at the conference when a Stockholm government representative," presumably Soderholm, "spoke to the participants about it."

* * * *

If you only read the first sentence of DOT’s brief response to the recent spate of bike fatalities on New York City’s streets, it comes across as a nice statement. It’s human. It expresses feelings. It’s not every day that you get emotion out of a big government bureaucracy.

But then you get to that second sentence and it’s all business. New York City’s streets are "crowded." Crowding results in "conflict." Sure, when there is conflict between a car and bike, the car is usually going to win. But what are you gonna do? We’ve got "limited space" here in the big city. ‘Flict happens. DOT can always point to the fact that overall pedestrian injury and fatality rates have fallen during the Weinshall years.

New Yorkers tend to view traffic congestion as something akin to the weather. It’s good, it’s bad, there is nothing much you can do about it. Traffic as a force beyond the control of mere mortals, just like New York City’s murder rate and school system were once considered unmanagable and beyond fixing.

In its two sentence public statement on the deaths of Dr. Carl Nacht and Derek Lake, DOT seems happy to reinforce this notion. It is probably more bureaucratic reflex than conscious strategy. The agency has liability issues to consider. And their job is probably a whole lot easier if the public isn’t too involved. The last thing DOT needs is community groups running around thinking that New York City could actually do something about traffic congestion. DOT is, after all, the city agency that would have to do it.

And yet, other world cities are proving that it is entirely possible to do something to reduce urban traffic congestion. If Commissioner Weinshall sat in on some of the presentations of her European colleagues on Thursday, she knows.

Thoughts and prayers are nice. But they are not what New York City needs from its transportation agency. 

  • my favorite slide is #20, where the DOT effectively shows how the mere use of orange cones on a buffered bike lane actually creates a 2 way greenway.

  • AD

    London … Stockholm … who will be next? Will New York be a world leader in this innovation, or follow the herd?

  • DOTdude

    AD: That all depends on mayoral leadership. Congestion pricing is one huge policy that is never going to happen without an executive edict. DOT will not (and probably, given its mandate and the existing legal and institutional framework, cannot) instigate such a policy on its own.

  • HT

    The mayor does not have the power to order the installation of congestion pricing or bridge tolls in New York City.

    Municipal and public interest lawyers agree that the City Council must establish congestion pricing through a law. However, the City claims that the state legislature must also pass authorizing legislation. It is likely that courts would have to decide this issue before pricing could go forward.

  • Pingback: StreetsBlog » Bridges Burning at DOT()

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Streetfilms: “We’re New York, We Can Lead”

|
Traffic Information & Relief Bill Press Conference  Running time: 4 minutes 3 seconds Transportation Alternatives held press conference on the steps of City Hall yesterday in support of Intro 199, a bill introduced in the City Council by Councilmember Gale Brewer that calls for better information-gathering about the city’s traffic and aims to "reduce the […]

City Announces Major Bike Safety Improvement Initiative

|
Two Hundred Miles Of New Bike Facilities Will Built In The Next Three Years. Releases Detailed Report On Bicycle Injuries And Fatalities. Changes Are Result Of Unprecedented Inter-Agency Collaboration Between Departments Of Transportation, Health, Parks And Police. The press conference is underway right now in at Tavern on the Green in Central Park. Here are […]

For Nearly Two Years, Ex-NYC DOT Chief Has Undercut the Signature Street Safety and Sustainable Transportation Agenda of Her Successor

|
Tomorrow, Brooklyn Supreme Court Judge Bert Bunyan is expected to weigh in for the first time on the core arguments brought by opponents of the Prospect Park West redesign against the City of New York. Ostensibly, the dispute is between the anti-bike lane groups known as “Neighbors for Better Bike Lanes” (NBBL) and “Seniors for […]

Breaking: DOT Commissioner Weinshall Gets a New Job

|
It looks like Streetsblog’s Weinshall Watch may be over. City University of New York just announced that New York City Department of Transportation Commissioner Iris Weinshall has been appointed as Vice Chancellor for Facilities Planning, Construction and Management. There has been no resignation announcement from the Department of Transportation. And there is no word as […]

Don’t Underestimate the Street Safety Benefits of Congestion Pricing

|
The primary benefits of the Move NY toll reform plan are reducing congestion and funding transit — but don’t overlook the huge potential to improve street safety. Recent research at Lancaster University in the UK suggests that since the introduction of the London congestion charge in 2003, lethal crashes have fallen faster than traffic congestion. The safety gains have even […]

DOT Pledged Ped Safety Fixes by 2006 on Deadly Third Ave

|
New York City’s Department of Transportation failed to follow through on a 2004 pledge to build potentially life-saving pedestrian safety improvements along the Third Avenue corridor where a 4-year-old boy was run over and killed last Tuesday. DOT’s announcement of $4 million in funding for the installation of "median extensions, neckdowns and other traffic-calming" measures […]